Impact of Educational Technology on Overcoming Misunderstandings in Algebraic Expressions via SOLO-Based Student Responses
Abstract
Students often face challenges when dealing with mathematical problems, and educational technologies can serve as complementary tools to facilitate the learning process. This study investigates the impact of educational technology on reducing conceptual misunderstandings in the topic of algebraic expressions among middle school female students. Using the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model to analyze the quality of students' responses, the study evaluates the effect of digital educational tools on the depth of learning and understanding of algebraic concepts. The results indicate a significant improvement in higher levels of the SOLO model among students who used educational technology.
Keywords:
Educational technology, Structure of the observed learning outcomes model, Mathematics educationReferences
- [1] Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897.
- [2] Selimi, A., Saracevic, M., & Useini, A. (2020). Impact of using digital tools in high school mathematics: A case study in North Macedonia. Universal journal of educational research, 8(8), 3615-3624. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080838
- [3] Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (2014). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press. https://books.google.nl/books?id=xUO0BQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
- [4] Mahmodi, M., & Masoumi Fard, M. (2023). The Effect of Educational Software on Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skill. Quarterly of Iranian Distance Education Journal, 5(1), 10-22. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30473/idej.2023.67745.1154
- [5] Saat, N. A., Alias, A. F., & Saat, M. Z. (2024). Digital Technology approach in mathematics education: a systematic review. International journal of academic research in progressive education and development, 13(4), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/22956
- [6] Hennessy, S., D'Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., ... & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and education open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
- [7] Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International journal of scientific research in modern science and technology, 3(4), 05-10. https://ijsrmst.com/index.php/ijsrmst/article/download/199/22
- [8] Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 41(1), 31-48. https://elearning-2023.it.auth.gr/pluginfile.php/2155296/mod_resource/content/2/Multimedia_Learning.pdf#page=55
- [9] Ersozlu, Z. (2024). The role of technology in reducing mathematics anxiety in primary school students. Contemporary educational technology, 16(3), 1-11. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1437497.pdf
- [10] Decker-Woodrow, L. E., Mason, C. A., Lee, J. E., Chan, J. Y. C., Sales, A., Liu, A., & Tu, S. (2023). The impacts of three educational technologies on algebraic understanding in the context of COVID-19. AERA open, 9, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231165919
- [11] Nafis, S. A. B. M., & Nasri, N. (2024). A comparative study on students' performance and satisfaction between traditional and online teaching methods in secondary school. International journal of academic research in progressive education and development, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21935%0D
- [12] Yousefi, E., Zamanzadeh NasrAbadi, M., & Azhini, M. (2025). Investigating the effect of flipped teaching on mathematical performance of ninth grade students using APOS theory. Trends and Achievements in Learning Technology, 2(5), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.22034/jlt.2025.2057557.1035
- [13] Devi, K. S. (2019). Constructivist approach to learning based on the concepts of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky An analytical Overview. Journal of Indian Education, 44(4), 5-19. https://ejournals.ncert.gov.in/index.php/jie/article/download/2553/2453/4699
- [14] Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications. https://B2n.ir/hr6139
- [15] Ahmadi Kalateh Ahmad, F., Meshkat, M., & Taghipour, M. (2024). Using SOLO model for evaluation of students’ physics learning. Physics journal| farhangian university, 1(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.48310/esip.2024.17397.1006
- [16] Fonger, N. L. (2019). Meaningfulness in representational fluency: An analytic lens for students’ creations, interpretations, and connections. The journal of mathematical behavior, 54, 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.003
- [17] Hofer, S. I., Holzberger, D., & Reiss, K. (2020). Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: A systematic research synthesis on 30 years of international research. Studies in educational evaluation, 65, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100864